The legislative battle over health services research.

نویسنده

  • B H Gray
چکیده

Budget reconciliation legislation in 1989 created the new Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), which folded in the National Center for Health Services Research and Health Care Technology Assessment, among the law's other provisions. The creation of the new agency represented a shift in priorities toward outcomes and effectiveness research in medical practice and made explicit the federal government's role in developing practice guidelines. The new agency was born in the midst of an extraordinary bipartisan budget negotiation process in late 1989; its becoming linked to the contentious issue of physician payment reform nearly killed the new agency before it appeared. The narrative of political wrangling that resulted in the creation of AHCPR spans Capitol Hill, the White House, the agencies of the Department of Health and Human Services, and renowed health services researchers on either coast and in Washington, D.C.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Health system changes in the absence of national reform.

W hen Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell, D-ME, pulled the plug on the healthcare reform debate September 26, it marked the end of a long, contentious, expensive legislative battle—for now. Many analysts in Washington, DC, believe this debate is far from over. However, politics and the need to return home to campaign for midterm elections have won out in the near term. The continuing pressu...

متن کامل

Health services research as a source of legislative analysis and input: the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program.

This article examines the role of the California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP) as a source of information in state health policy making. It explains why the California benefits review process relies heavily on university-based researchers and employs a broad set of criteria for review, which set it apart from similar programs in other states. It then analyzes the politics of health ins...

متن کامل

Overview and commentary.

The California Health Benefits Review Program (CHBRP)--established in 2003 in response to new state legislation aimed at enhancing the evaluation of potential changes in health benefit packages--represents a unique marriage of academic analysis and real-time legislative decision making. CHBRP is based within the University of California (UC) Office of the President and provides analyses to the ...

متن کامل

Who Blinks First? Legislative Patience and Bargaining with Governors

When legislators and governors clash over the size of American state government, what strategic factors determine who wins? Efforts to address this question have traditionally relied upon setter models borrowed from the congressional literature and have predicted legislative dominance. We offer an alternative simplification of state budget negotiations that follows the “staring match” logic cap...

متن کامل

Effect of Legal Thought in Explaining Legislative Policies in the Field of Health

Introduction: The right to health is one of the fundamental concepts of development that has  a significant relationship with other human rights and everyone is entitled to reach the highest standard  of  physical  and  mental  health.  However,  the  history  of  the  activities  and  actions  of  governments  as  well  as  public  rights  regulating  public  health  regulations  indicates  a ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Health affairs

دوره 11 4  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1992